Grantmaking
Opportunities publish their criteria, review stages and decision dates before opening. Awards are published once made, with the recipient, purpose and term.
Transparency centre
How we decide, how we spend, how we govern ourselves, and how we handle it when something goes wrong.
Sections
Opportunities publish their criteria, review stages and decision dates before opening. Awards are published once made, with the recipient, purpose and term.
Every award carries a budget reviewed line by line. Overheads are funded, not squeezed, and variance is discussed rather than penalised.
Each year we publish what we funded, what it cost to run the Foundation, what we learned, and what we would change.
Decisions above delegated limits go to the board. Conflicts are declared before assessment and recorded in the decision file.
Privacy, terms, accessibility, safeguarding, conflict of interest, whistleblowing and retention are all published.
Material changes to programmes, paused grants and safeguarding actions are disclosed, subject to the privacy of the people involved.
One story structure, named sources for every figure, grantee sign-off before publication, and failures written up in the same format.
Unsuccessful applicants may request written feedback and may appeal on process grounds. Appeals are reviewed by someone outside the original panel.
Commitments
Publish assessment criteria before an opportunity opens, and never change them mid-cycle.
Give every applicant a decision by the published date, and written feedback on request after interview stage.
Fund overheads honestly rather than pretending programmes run without them.
Publish what did not work alongside what did.
Say 'we do not know yet' instead of estimating.
Organizational information
Disclosure status
Exishmum Foundation does not currently publish legal registration, tax status or audited financial figures on this website. Verification requests can be sent through the contact page.